Though it seems contradictory, Americans still widely believe that they receive the best health care in the world, even as they express dissatisfaction with the affordability, safety and equity of health care delivery and financing in the United States. Indeed, even as U.S. medical technology is second to none, Americans' medical bills are higher and patient outcomes are poorer compared to other developed countries.
According to the Institute of Medicine (IOM), quality health care is that which is safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable and "patient-centered," meaning that all people have equal access to cost-effective care that is based on research, responsive to their individual needs, preferences and cultures, and that patients are engaged as partners in care decisions. According to a recent Commonwealth Fund state scorecard on health system performance, Colorado performs less well than most states on quality (30th), access (35th) and equity (43rd) indicators.
In Colorado, as nationally, quality of care is often inconsistent. Quality "report cards" issued by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Colorado Business Group on Health indicate that while pockets of consistently high quality services exist (e.g., care after heart attack), care is variable at best. Similarly, data reveal consistently poor performance in certain maternal and child health indicators and nursing home care. According to the IOM, many of these indicators show that quality of care is often lower for communities of color due to cultural andl inguistic barriers and provider bias.
The current health care system consists of many different components (e.g., hospitals, primary care physicians, specialists, outpatient clinics, rehabilitation centers, long-term care) that largely function independently with little coordination. Such an environment makes it difficult for providers to communicate and share important health information, and increases the chance for medical errors, waste and duplication of services and procedures. For patients, this disjointed system can be confusing, nearly impossible to navigate and often fails to produce positive health outcomes. Patients with limited English language proficiency are at a particular disadvantage.